Divided into four parts - 'Normative Pragmatics', 'The Challenge of Inferentialism', 'Inferentialist Semantics', and 'Brandom's Replies', this title covers the aspects such as inferentialism versus representationalism, normativity in philosophy of language and mind, and pragmatics and the centrality of asserting language entries and exits.
'Many philosophers find Brandom's Making It Explicit to be an impossibly indispensable book: too original, insightful and provocative to ignore, but too massive, wide-ranging, detailed and revisionist to assimilate in real time. Reading Brandom significantly lowers the barrier to serious philosophical engagement with this indisputably important work. Its well-chosen essays with Brandom's replies bring clarity and focus to the central issues raised by his project.'- Joseph Rouse, Wesleyan University, USA
'Reading Brandom constitutes a thorough discussion of Brandom's work, bringing out the different aspects and tensions in Making it Explicit. Brandom's replies to his critics shed new light on his work and move the discussion an important step forward.'- Michael Esfeld, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
'Like other great philosophers, Brandom builds conceptual resources whose significance transcends his applications of them, and whose fertility and rigor will leave a lasting mark on how philosophy is done. This excellent collection of essays and replies is an invaluable resource for anyone who wishes to master Brandom's work. Regardless of one's area of specialization, there is profit in mastering it.'- Rick Grush, University of California, San Diego, USA
'Anyone interested in Robert Brandom's influential magnum opus in the philosophy of language, Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment (Harvard, 1994), will want to own this fine collection of new critical essays on Brandom's work by prominent philosophers along with clarifying replies by Brandom. ... Bernhard Weiss and Jeremy Wanderer have assembled an outstanding group of philosophers to probe and criticize or amend and extend Brandom's project.' - James R. O'Shea, University College Dublin, Ireland, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
